Homepage Free Judgment New York Supreme Court Form
Jump Links

The Judgment New York Supreme Court form is a crucial document in legal proceedings, particularly in cases involving arbitration and insurance claims. This form is used to present a petition to the court, which includes important details such as the names of the parties involved, the index number of the case, and the specific motions being requested. In the context of Liberty Mutual Insurance Company’s petition, the form outlines the request to permanently stay arbitration related to uninsured motorist benefits. It details the timeline of events leading to the petition, including the initial claim made by the respondents, Fanny Tigre and Teresa Hernandez, and the subsequent actions taken by Liberty Mutual. Key issues arise from the service of the petition, as the court examines whether the original and amended notices were properly served according to legal requirements. The form highlights the complexities of jurisdiction, service defects, and the necessity for compliance with procedural rules. Understanding this form is essential for anyone navigating the legal landscape of insurance disputes in New York, as it encapsulates the procedural steps and the legal standards that govern such cases.

Similar forms

The Judgment New York Supreme Court form shares similarities with several other legal documents. Each document serves a distinct purpose within the legal process, yet they maintain comparable structural and procedural elements. Below is a list of six documents that are similar to the Judgment New York Supreme Court form:

  • Notice of Motion: Like the Judgment form, a Notice of Motion outlines the request being made to the court and includes essential details such as the parties involved and the relief sought. Both documents must be properly served to ensure the court has jurisdiction.
  • Pleading: A pleading, such as a complaint or answer, is similar in that it sets forth the claims or defenses of the parties. Both documents require clear articulation of the issues at hand and adherence to procedural rules to be considered valid by the court.
  • Affidavit: An affidavit is a sworn statement that supports claims made in a motion or petition. Both the Judgment form and affidavits must include factual assertions and be properly executed to be admissible in court.
  • Order to Show Cause: This document compels a party to appear before the court and explain why a certain action should or should not be taken. Similar to the Judgment form, it requires specific information about the parties and the relief sought, and must comply with service requirements.
  • Response to Petition: A response to a petition is akin to the Judgment form as it addresses the claims made by the petitioner. Both documents must be filed within a specified timeframe and follow procedural rules to ensure they are considered by the court.
  • Settlement Agreement: A settlement agreement outlines the terms agreed upon by the parties to resolve a dispute. While it differs in purpose, it shares the necessity for clarity and compliance with legal standards to be enforceable, much like the Judgment form.

Understanding these similarities is crucial for anyone navigating the legal system, as it highlights the importance of proper documentation and adherence to procedural rules in achieving desired outcomes.

Form Preview

Short Form Order and Judgment

NEW YORK SUPREME COURT - QUEENS COUNTY

Present: HONORABLE JAIME A. RIOS

IA PART 8

 

 

Justice

 

_____________________________________

 

 

 

X

Index

LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,

Number 14682/04

 

 

Petitioner,

Motion

 

 

 

Date September 1, 2004

 

- against -

 

 

 

 

Motion

FANNY TIGRE and TERESA HERNANDEZ,

Cal. Number 20

 

 

Respondents,

 

 

- and -

 

JOHANNA MARTINEZ,

 

Proposed Add’l. Respondent.

 

 

 

X

 

The following papers numbered 1 to 7 were read on this amended notice of petition and petition by the petitioner, pursuant to CPLR article 75, seeking to permanently stay the arbitration demanded by the respondents or alternative relief.

 

 

 

Papers

 

 

 

Numbered

Notice of

Petition - Affidavits

- Exhibits

1-4

Answering

Affidavits - Exhibits

..................

5-7

Upon the foregoing papers it is ordered that the amended notice of petition and petition are determined as follows:

The threshold issue presented in this proceeding to permanently stay an arbitration for uninsured motorist insurance benefits is whether service of the original petition and amended notice of petition and petition were jurisdictionally defective.

The genesis of the controversy was a letter dated October 4, 2002, wherein the attorney for the respondents Fanny Tigre and Teresa Hernandez (the respondents), advised the petitioner Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (Liberty Mutual), of the respondents’ notice of intention to make a claim for

uninsured/underinsured benefits based upon an accident that occurred on September 4, 2002.

By demand dated June 1, 2004 and received by Liberty Mutual on June 7, 2004, the respondents, through their attorney, sought arbitration of their claim for such benefits.

Court records disclose that Liberty Mutual filed a notice of petition and petition to permanently stay the arbitration on June 25, 2004; however, the notice of petition bore a return date of June 27, 2004, a period of two days, and there is no affidavit of service in the record. In any event, on June 30, 2004, Liberty Mutual served an amended notice of petition bearing a return date of July 27, 2004.

Annexed to the amended notice of petition is an affidavit of service which initially states that service was made by certified mail, return receipt requested; however, Liberty Mutual has not produced the return receipt or other evidence of such mailing. Moreover, the affidavit of service also states that service was accomplished by regular mail, and the respondents’ attorney has produced an envelope demonstrating that the amended notice was served on him by regular mail.

In its petition Liberty Mutual seeks, inter alia, a permanent stay on the ground that the adverse vehicle had insurance coverage. In the alternative, it seeks leave to join the driver of the offending vehicle, and a temporary stay pending a hearing on the issue of coverage. In addition, Liberty Mutual seeks an order directing the respondents’ compliancy with the insurance policy provisions mandating discovery.

The respondents oppose the petition contending, inter alia, that: (1) the original notice of petition was a nullity as it bore an incorrect return date; (2) the amended notice of petition was a nullity as it was served by regular mail rather than in a manner required by CPLR 7503; (3) Liberty Mutual failed to demonstrate that the offending vehicle was insured; and, (4) Liberty Mutual waived its right to discovery.

Pursuant to CPLR 304, a special proceeding is commenced by the delivery of a notice of petition and petition to the clerk of the court in the county in which the special proceeding is brought, and the payment of the filing fee (see Matter of One Beacon Ins. Co./CGU Ins. Co. v Daly, 7 AD3d 717 [2004]; Matter of Allstate Indem. Co. v Martinez, 4 AD3d 422 [2004]; CPLR 304).

With respect to service, CPLR 7503[c] provides that notice of an application to stay arbitration shall be served in the same

-2-

manner as a summons or by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested (see CPLR 7503[c]). The service requirements of CPLR 7503 have been strictly construed, and it has been held repeatedly that service by ordinary mail renders the application jurisdictionally defective (see Matter of Yak Taxi v Teke, 41 NY2d 1020 [1977]; Matter of N.Y. Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v Czumaj, 9 AD3d 833 [2004]; Matter of Cartier v County of Nassau, 281 AD2d 477 [2001]; Matter of Progressive Ins. Co., 235 AD2d 704 [1997]).

Although CPLR 7503[c] permits service of an application to stay arbitration upon a claimant’s attorney if the attorney’ s name appears on the demand for arbitration or the notice of intention to arbitrate, at all times service must be made in the same manner as a summons or by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested (see Matter of Yak Taxi, Inc. v Teke, supra; CPLR 7503[c]).

Here, with respect to the original notice of petition and petition, Liberty failed to demonstrate proper service. Moreover, it was jurisdictionally defective as it failed to give adequate notice of the return date to the respondents (see Matter of Cartier v County of Nassau, supra; Matter of Hawkins v McCall, 278 AD2d 638 [2000], lv denied, 96 NY2d 713 [2001]; CPLR 403[b], [c]).

With respect to the amended notice of petition, Liberty failed to produce any proof of service upon the respondents in accordance with CPLR 7503[c], and the respondents demonstrated that the amended notice of petition was served on their attorney only by regular mail.

As a result, the amended notice of petition and petition are also jurisdictionally defective (see Matter of Yak Taxi v Teke, supra; Matter of N.Y. Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v Czumaj, supra; Matter of Cartier v County of Nassau, supra; Matter of Progressive Ins. Co., supra).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the proceeding is dismissed.

Dated: December 10, 2004

______________________________

 

J.S.C.

-3-

Common mistakes

Filling out the Judgment New York Supreme Court form can be a daunting task. Many individuals make common mistakes that can lead to delays or even dismissal of their case. Understanding these pitfalls can help ensure a smoother process.

One frequent error involves incorrect return dates. The form requires a specific return date for the notice of petition. If this date is incorrect, it can render the notice ineffective. For instance, a return date that is only two days after filing can lead to jurisdictional issues, as it may not provide adequate time for the other party to respond.

Another common mistake is failing to follow the proper service requirements. The law stipulates that notice of an application to stay arbitration must be served in a specific manner, such as by certified mail with a return receipt requested. Using ordinary mail instead can make the application jurisdictionally defective, as seen in previous cases.

Some individuals neglect to include an affidavit of service. This document is crucial as it proves that the other party was properly notified. Without it, the court may question whether the required procedures were followed, leading to potential dismissal of the case.

Additionally, people often overlook the necessity of demonstrating that the opposing party was served correctly. Even if an affidavit of service is present, if it states that service was made by regular mail, it does not meet the legal requirements. This can be particularly problematic if the other party disputes receiving the notice.

Another mistake is failing to provide sufficient evidence regarding the insurance coverage of the vehicle involved. If the petition seeks to stay arbitration based on the claim that the vehicle was insured, the petitioner must present proof. Without this, the court may dismiss the petition due to lack of evidence.

Moreover, some individuals mistakenly believe that they can simply amend their notice of petition without addressing previous deficiencies. However, if the original notice was flawed, the amended notice may still be considered defective if it does not rectify the issues present in the original filing.

People also sometimes forget to check if their attorney’s name appears on the demand for arbitration. If the attorney's name is not included, the service may not be valid, leading to complications in the proceedings.

Lastly, failing to pay the required filing fee can halt the process entirely. It is essential to ensure that all fees are paid at the time of filing to avoid any delays or dismissals due to administrative issues.

More About Judgment New York Supreme Court

  1. What is the Judgment New York Supreme Court form?

    The Judgment form from the New York Supreme Court is a legal document used to record the outcome of a court case. It outlines the court's decision regarding a particular matter, such as a petition to stay arbitration, and includes details like the parties involved, the case number, and the judge's ruling.

  2. Who can file a Judgment in the New York Supreme Court?

    Any party involved in a legal proceeding can file a Judgment in the New York Supreme Court. This typically includes petitioners, respondents, and their legal representatives. In the context of arbitration cases, the petitioner is usually the party seeking to stay the arbitration.

  3. What does it mean to stay arbitration?

    Staying arbitration means temporarily halting the arbitration process. A party may request this if they believe there are legal grounds to prevent the arbitration from proceeding, such as jurisdictional issues or disputes over coverage. The court will then review the request and make a determination.

  4. What are the service requirements for filing a Judgment?

    According to New York law, the service of the notice of petition must be conducted in a specific manner. It can be served in the same way as a summons or through registered or certified mail, with a return receipt requested. Failure to adhere to these requirements can lead to jurisdictional defects, potentially invalidating the filing.

  5. What happens if the service is deemed defective?

    If the service is found to be defective, the court may dismiss the petition. This means that the party's request to stay arbitration or any other relief sought may not be granted, leaving them without the legal protection they were seeking.

  6. Can a party appeal a Judgment made by the New York Supreme Court?

    Yes, a party can appeal a Judgment made by the New York Supreme Court. However, they must follow specific procedures and timelines for filing an appeal. It is crucial to consult with a legal professional to understand the requirements and implications of appealing a court's decision.

  7. What should I do if I receive a Judgment form?

    If you receive a Judgment form, it is important to read it carefully and understand its implications. Consider seeking legal advice to determine your options and any necessary actions you may need to take. Timeliness is key, especially if you plan to contest the Judgment or file an appeal.

Misconceptions

  • Misconception 1: The Judgment New York Supreme Court form is only for large corporations.
  • This is not true. The form can be used by individuals, small businesses, and larger corporations alike. It is designed to address various legal matters and is accessible to anyone who needs to navigate the court system.

  • Misconception 2: Filing the form guarantees a favorable outcome.
  • Many people believe that simply filing the form will lead to a positive judgment. However, the court's decision depends on the specific circumstances of each case. Proper preparation and legal arguments are essential for achieving the desired result.

  • Misconception 3: The form can be completed without any legal knowledge.
  • While it is possible to fill out the form without formal legal training, understanding the requirements and implications of the information being provided is crucial. Errors or omissions can lead to delays or unfavorable rulings.

  • Misconception 4: The process is quick and straightforward.
  • Many individuals expect the process to be swift. In reality, legal proceedings can be complex and time-consuming. Factors such as court schedules, required documentation, and potential disputes can extend the timeline significantly.

Key takeaways

When filling out and using the Judgment New York Supreme Court form, consider the following key takeaways:

  • Understand the Purpose: This form is used to seek a stay of arbitration for uninsured motorist benefits. Knowing the purpose helps in accurately completing the form.
  • Proper Service is Crucial: Service must comply with CPLR 7503(c). This means using registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, to ensure proper notification.
  • Check Return Dates: The return date on the notice of petition must be correct. An incorrect return date can render the petition a nullity.
  • Affidavit of Service: Always include an affidavit of service that proves the notice was delivered as required. Lack of proof can lead to jurisdictional defects.
  • Respondents’ Rights: Be aware that respondents can challenge the petition on grounds such as improper service or failure to demonstrate insurance coverage.
  • Consequences of Defects: If the form is filled out incorrectly or served improperly, the court may dismiss the proceeding, as seen in prior cases.

Judgment New York Supreme Court: Usage Guide

Filling out the Judgment New York Supreme Court form requires careful attention to detail. This form is essential for initiating a legal proceeding and must be completed accurately to ensure that the court processes your request properly. Below are the steps to guide you through the process of filling out the form.

  1. Obtain the Form: Access the Judgment New York Supreme Court form from the official New York State court website or your local courthouse.
  2. Fill in the Court Information: At the top of the form, enter the name of the court, which is the New York Supreme Court, followed by the county name (e.g., Queens County).
  3. Presenting Justice: Write the name of the presiding judge. In this example, it would be "HONORABLE JAIME A. RIOS."
  4. Index Number: Input the index number assigned to your case. This is a unique identifier that helps the court track your case.
  5. Petitioner Information: Clearly state the name of the petitioner. For example, "LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY."
  6. Respondent Information: List the names of the respondents involved in the case, such as "FANNY TIGRE and TERESA HERNANDEZ."
  7. Proposed Additional Respondent: If applicable, include the name of any proposed additional respondent, like "JOHANNA MARTINEZ."
  8. Motion Date: Indicate the date of the motion. For example, "September 1, 2004."
  9. Motion Calendar Number: Enter the motion calendar number, which helps the court organize and schedule motions.
  10. Detail the Nature of the Petition: Provide a brief description of the nature of the petition, referencing the request to stay arbitration or any other relief sought.
  11. Attach Necessary Documents: Ensure that all supporting documents, such as affidavits and exhibits, are attached and numbered as referenced in the form.
  12. Sign and Date the Form: Finally, ensure that the form is signed and dated by the petitioner or their attorney, as required.

Once the form is filled out completely, it should be submitted to the court clerk along with the necessary filing fee. After submission, the court will process your petition, and you will receive further instructions regarding the next steps in your case.